Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: ftrace/perf_event leak | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Date | Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:59:45 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 14:15 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Thanks for fixing this. > > However, can we split this in two patches to ease the backport? > > The lack of a module_put() after perf_trace_init() failure is there for a while > (the backport needs to start in 2.6.32). > > But the lack of a module_put in the destroy path needs a .35 backport only.
I don't think it really needs two patches. Just notify stable (and Greg KH in particular) about the backport requirements. Greg can handle it ;)
-- Steve
| |