[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: netfilter: add xt_cpu match

On Monday 2010-08-09 21:52, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> +       tristate '"cpu" match support'
>> +       depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED
>> +       help
>> +         CPU matching allows you to match packets based on the CPU
>> +         currently handling the packet.
>Shouldn't this depend on SMP? Or does it make sense to have it on UP, too?

Well one thing to consider is that you certainly would not want to
make one ruleset willingly unloadable on another machine (think
automatic code/rule generators).
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-09 22:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean