[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
    On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Paul E. McKenney
    <> wrote:
    > o       "Ill-behaved application" AKA "untrusted application" AKA
    >        "crappy application".

    > o       "PM-driving application" are applications that are permitted
    >        to acquire suspend blockers on Android.

    These definitions are wrong.

    1) There are trusted applications that misbehave (the user clicks Yes
    when asked about PM permissions)
    2) There are untrusted applications that are power optimized (The user
    clicks No)

    The proponents of suspend blockers in user-space have tried to ignore
    this fact, but the truth is that PM permissions and power optimization
    are orthogonal to each other.

    Felipe Contreras
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-08 14:43    [W:0.046 / U:4.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site