[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly in too_many_isolated
    On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Mel Gorman <> wrote:
    > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:31:18AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
    >> Iram reported compaction's too_many_isolated loops forever.
    >> (
    >> The meminfo of situation happened was inactive anon is zero.
    >> That's because the system has no memory pressure until then.
    >> While all anon pages was in active lru, compaction could select
    >> active lru as well as inactive lru. That's different things
    >> with vmscan's isolated. So we has been two too_many_isolated.
    >> While compaction can isolated pages in both active and inactive,
    >> current implementation of too_many_isolated only considers inactive.
    >> It made Iram's problem.
    >> This patch handles active and inactive with fair.
    >> That's because we can't expect where from and how many compaction would
    >> isolated pages.
    >> This patch changes (nr_isolated > nr_inactive) with
    >> nr_isolated > (nr_active + nr_inactive) / 2.
    >> Cc: Iram Shahzad <>
    >> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <>
    >> Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <>
    >> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <>
    > Please send this patch on its own as it looks like it should be merged and
    > arguably is a stable candidate for 2.6.35. Alternatively, Andrew, can you pick
    > up just this patch? It seems unrelated to the second patch on COMPACTPAGEFAILED.

    I thought it's not urgent and next patch would apply based on this
    patch without HUNK.
    If Andrew doesn't have a response, I will resend as a standalone.

    Kind regards,
    Minchan Kim

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-26 11:43    [W:0.021 / U:1.244 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site