[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] Finer granularity and task/cgroup irq time accounting
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:17 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> "There are usecases where reporting this time against task
> or task groups or cgroups will be useful for user/administrator
> in terms of resource planning and utilization charging"

Or confusing, what happens if you attribute the IRQ overhead of a
ping-flood to your tasks?

By not providing these numbers per task/group people will have to
actually think about what it is that is causing these high irq loads and
have a chance of actually doing better than random attribution.

So no, providing random numbers on the slight chance that they might
possibly make sense for your workload doesn't seem like a sound reason
to provide them.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-24 15:11    [W:0.102 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site