[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] Finer granularity and task/cgroup irq time accounting
    On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:17 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
    > "There are usecases where reporting this time against task
    > or task groups or cgroups will be useful for user/administrator
    > in terms of resource planning and utilization charging"

    Or confusing, what happens if you attribute the IRQ overhead of a
    ping-flood to your tasks?

    By not providing these numbers per task/group people will have to
    actually think about what it is that is causing these high irq loads and
    have a chance of actually doing better than random attribution.

    So no, providing random numbers on the slight chance that they might
    possibly make sense for your workload doesn't seem like a sound reason
    to provide them.

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-24 15:11    [W:3.671 / U:0.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site