[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.32 and later
    On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Kay Diederichs wrote:
    > Performance-wise, we tried mounting with barrier versus nobarrier (or
    > barrier=1 versus barrier=0) and re-did the 2.6.32+ benchmarks. It turned
    > out that the benchmark difference with and without barrier is less than
    > the variation between runs (which is much higher with 2.6.32+ than with
    > 2.6.27-stable), so the influence seems to be minor.

    Did you check interactions with the IO scheduler?

    "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
    them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
    where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
    Henrique Holschuh

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-02 18:07    [W:0.022 / U:42.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site