Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [LOCKDEP BUG][2.6.36-rc1] xt_info_wrlock? | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:31:33 +0200 |
| |
Le lundi 16 août 2010 à 13:07 -0400, Steven Rostedt a écrit : > Hi, I hit this when booting 2.6.36-rc1: > > ================================= > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > 2.6.36-rc1 #2937 > --------------------------------- > inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. > ifup-eth/3288 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes: > (&(&lock->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables] > {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: > [<ffffffff8107b08e>] __lock_acquire+0x756/0x93c > [<ffffffff8107b374>] lock_acquire+0x100/0x12d > [<ffffffff813f4ec3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73 > [<ffffffffa01664b1>] get_counters+0xb2/0x168 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffffa01665a3>] alloc_counters+0x3c/0x47 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffffa0167a7b>] do_ip6t_get_ctl+0x10c/0x363 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffff813863a2>] nf_sockopt+0x5a/0x86 > [<ffffffff813863e6>] nf_getsockopt+0x18/0x1a > [<ffffffffa034c1ff>] ipv6_getsockopt+0x84/0xba [ipv6] > [<ffffffffa0353289>] rawv6_getsockopt+0x42/0x4b [ipv6] > [<ffffffff81355571>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x14/0x16 > [<ffffffff813525bb>] sys_getsockopt+0x7a/0x9b > [<ffffffff8100ad32>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > irq event stamp: 40 > hardirqs last enabled at (40): [<ffffffff813f5ad5>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x79 > hardirqs last disabled at (39): [<ffffffff813f5036>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x92 > softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff8104975a>] copy_process+0x40e/0x11ce > softirqs last disabled at (9): [<ffffffff8100bc9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 > > other info that might help us debug this: > 3 locks held by ifup-eth/3288: > #0: (&idev->mc_ifc_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8105841c>] run_timer_softirq+0x1f5/0x3e6 > #1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffffa03578ca>] mld_sendpack+0x0/0x3ab [ipv6] > #2: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff81384f83>] nf_hook_slow+0x0/0x119 > > stack backtrace: > Pid: 3288, comm: ifup-eth Not tainted 2.6.36-rc1 #2937 > Call Trace: > <IRQ> [<ffffffff81077ae6>] print_usage_bug+0x1a4/0x1b5 > [<ffffffff810164fa>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x4c > [<ffffffff8106cd0c>] ? local_clock+0x40/0x59 > [<ffffffff810786b6>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xcf > [<ffffffff81077de1>] mark_lock+0x2ea/0x51f > [<ffffffff8107b014>] __lock_acquire+0x6dc/0x93c > [<ffffffff8106cd0c>] ? local_clock+0x40/0x59 > [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffff8107b374>] lock_acquire+0x100/0x12d > [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffff81011149>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd > [<ffffffff813f4ec3>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73 > [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ? ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffffa0166eef>] ip6t_do_table+0x8a/0x3f1 [ip6_tables] > [<ffffffff810771db>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x9e > [<ffffffff81384f83>] ? nf_hook_slow+0x0/0x119 > [<ffffffffa010601c>] ip6table_filter_hook+0x1c/0x20 [ip6table_filter] > [<ffffffff81384f40>] nf_iterate+0x46/0x89 > [<ffffffffa035627b>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x5c [ipv6] > [<ffffffff8138501b>] nf_hook_slow+0x98/0x119 > [<ffffffffa035627b>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x5c [ipv6] > [<ffffffffa0349557>] ? icmp6_dst_alloc+0x0/0x1b2 [ipv6] > [<ffffffffa0357b01>] mld_sendpack+0x237/0x3ab [ipv6] > [<ffffffff81051475>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xc7/0xeb > [<ffffffffa0358390>] mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x254/0x28d [ipv6] > [<ffffffff810584ed>] run_timer_softirq+0x2c6/0x3e6 > [<ffffffff8105841c>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x1f5/0x3e6 > [<ffffffffa035813c>] ? mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x0/0x28d [ipv6] > [<ffffffff8105169e>] ? __do_softirq+0x79/0x247 > [<ffffffff81051763>] __do_softirq+0x13e/0x247 > [<ffffffff8100bc9c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 > [<ffffffff8100d32f>] do_softirq+0x4b/0xa3 > [<ffffffff8105120a>] irq_exit+0x4a/0x95 > [<ffffffff813fc185>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8c/0x9a > [<ffffffff8100b753>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20 > <EOI> [<ffffffff8102c72a>] ? native_flush_tlb_global+0x2b/0x32 > [<ffffffff81031fec>] kernel_map_pages+0x12c/0x142 > [<ffffffff810cc89a>] free_pages_prepare+0x14c/0x15d > [<ffffffff810cc9c8>] free_hot_cold_page+0x2d/0x165 > [<ffffffff810ccb2b>] __free_pages+0x2b/0x34 > [<ffffffff810ccb7d>] free_pages+0x49/0x4e > [<ffffffff81033871>] pgd_free+0x71/0x79 > [<ffffffff81048b1b>] __mmdrop+0x27/0x54 > [<ffffffff81042c62>] finish_task_switch+0xb4/0xe4 > [<ffffffff81042bae>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xe4 > [<ffffffff810096e7>] ? __switch_to+0x1a9/0x297 > [<ffffffff81042df3>] schedule_tail+0x30/0xa7 > [<ffffffff8100ac33>] ret_from_fork+0x13/0x80 > > I noticed in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c in get_counters() as with > other "get_counters()" functions do not block bottom halves anymore as > to this commit: > > commit 24b36f0193467fa727b85b4c004016a8dae999b9 > Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> > Date: Mon Aug 2 16:49:01 2010 +0200 > > netfilter: {ip,ip6,arp}_tables: dont block bottom half more than necessary > > We currently disable BH for the whole duration of get_counters() > > Now we take xt_info_wrlock(cpu) lock out of BH disabling. And that lock > even has the following comment: > > /* > * The "writer" side needs to get exclusive access to the lock, > * regardless of readers. This must be called with bottom half > * processing (and thus also preemption) disabled. > */ > static inline void xt_info_wrlock(unsigned int cpu) > > > As lockdep has proven, this is not satisfied. > > -- Steve > >
This is a false positive, and a patch was sent yesterday
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/61750/
Thanks
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |