Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:09:11 +0100 | | From | Matthew Garrett <> | | Subject | Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three |
| |
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> they tend to go "off". > > however I think you're making an assumption that there is a > real difference between a deep idle state and "off".... > > For modern x86 hardware, that assumption isn't really valid. > (other than a very very small sram that stores register content in the > idle case)
Really? I thought the TSC stopped in suspend. Does having a package go into C6 mean that the RAM goes into self-refresh?
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
|  |