[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> they tend to go "off".
> however I think you're making an assumption that there is a
> real difference between a deep idle state and "off"....
> For modern x86 hardware, that assumption isn't really valid.
> (other than a very very small sram that stores register content in the
> idle case)

Really? I thought the TSC stopped in suspend. Does having a package go
into C6 mean that the RAM goes into self-refresh?

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-16 18:13    [W:0.210 / U:5.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site