[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
    On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

    > they tend to go "off".
    > however I think you're making an assumption that there is a
    > real difference between a deep idle state and "off"....
    > For modern x86 hardware, that assumption isn't really valid.
    > (other than a very very small sram that stores register content in the
    > idle case)

    Really? I thought the TSC stopped in suspend. Does having a package go
    into C6 mean that the RAM goes into self-refresh?

    Matthew Garrett |

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-16 18:13    [W:0.031 / U:1.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site