Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:21:53 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [git pull request] ACPI patches for 2.6.36.merge |
| |
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:04:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > I'd be suspecting that we have two patches both of which worked > > separately but which broke when combined. Is there some other patch in > > that tree which adds a new reference to `ref' in acpi_power_seq_show()? > > The offending patch isn't about acpi_power_seq_show(), it's about > acpi_power_off_device().
The patch I sent Len patched acpi_power_seq_show().
> > ... > > What does that say about the _rest_ of the patches?
Not tested in combination?
> What does that say about (lack of) -next testing?
That code compiled OK in -mm which includes linux-next. I assume that some last-minute merging broke things.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |