lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
    From
    On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
    <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
    > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
    >>  4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice
    >
    > Here I disagree.  The Android folks have used it for quite some time.
    > We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software
    > stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it.

    So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say.

    If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications",
    then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble
    a basic typical system (X.org, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a
    couple of days.

    --
    Felipe Contreras
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-13 17:31    [W:0.020 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site