[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>  4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice
> Here I disagree.  The Android folks have used it for quite some time.
> We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software
> stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it.

So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say.

If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications",
then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble
a basic typical system (, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a
couple of days.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-13 17:31    [W:0.195 / U:5.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site