[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
    On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:48:48PM -0700, Brian Swetland wrote:
    > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Felipe Contreras
    > <> wrote:
    > >
    > > Not Ubuntu, not Fedora, not MeeGo, not anyone with a typical
    > > user-space seems to be having this problem. I can argue to you that
    > > this problem can be solved in easier ways, but instead I will argue
    > > that perhaps we should wait for somebody besides Android to complain
    > > about it before providing a "solution". Because after all, what good
    > > is a "solution" provided by the kernel, if the user-space is not going
    > > to use it, ever.
    > I'm curious, when does Android count as a user of the kernel? I
    > gather that volume of sales or users doesn't count. Do we have to
    > include some percentage of "desktop" Linux?
    > If we're an undesirable second-class citizen, why do people care that
    > "android is forking the kernel"?
    > I guess I don't understand,

    I guess I don't, either -- there are some parts of the kernel used by only a
    handful of users... and here we speak about million users...


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-08-12 21:55    [W:0.028 / U:11.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site