[lkml]   [2010]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:44:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Which reminds me. I forgot a very important way that user space signals
> the kernel as to its intents.
> The kernel can see whether code is sleeping by choice or sleeping because
> someone blocked it (eg a page fault). The kernel also knows a lot about
> the event being waited for (much more so in -rt than base).
> We don't capture all of that info but it seems it would advance progress
> in the right direction to do so better.

As one approach of many, this makes a great deal of sense.

Thanx, Paul

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-08-11 02:47    [W:0.296 / U:7.920 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site