Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:16:39 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [stable] [Stable-review] [116/165] ext4: dont return to userspace after freezing the fs with a mutex held |
| |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:00:43AM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote: > On 08/07/2010 03:38 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:02:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>>> On 08/02/2010 07:04 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: > >>>>> We have reports about this patch breaking lvm snapshhots. Eric, there is a patch > >>>>> mentioned which is supposed to fix things but its not upstream, yet. > >>>>> Do you know what happened to that? > >>>> right, patch below is needed to fix things. > >>>> > >>>> Ted just acked it on the list recently; Greg, I'd either drop 116/165 > >>>> for now, or include the patch below which should be upstream soon... > >>> I can't take anything that isn't upstream yet. > >>> > >>> And I just released with this patch in the kernel, should I do a revert > >>> and do a new release? > >> > >> Any answers on this? > >> > > > > Yes, I'd revert it for now, I'm afraid, if the other patch isn't upstream > > yet. > > > > Sorry about that, > > > > -Eric > > Upstream as of now (same SHA1 as in linux-next): > > >From 437f88cc031ffe7f37f3e705367f4fe1f4be8b0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> > Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:33:29 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] (pre-stable) ext4: fix freeze deadlock under IO
It looks like I can't drop the original one, as this patch builds on it. So I'll just queue this one up.
Should it also go into other -stable releases (like .35 and/or .34 -stable?)
thanks,
greg k-h
| |