Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:14:49 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: msm: Add System MMU support. | From | FUJITA Tomonori <> |
| |
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:06:08 +0200 "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 04:46:59AM -0400, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:40:19 +0200 > > "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com> wrote: > > > > > The IOMMU-API is not about SR-IOV. > > > > That's true. However, the point is that include/iommu.h is far from > > the IOMMU-API. > > > > You could still insist that include/iommu.h is designed for the > > generic IOMMU-API. But the fact is that it's designed for very > > specific purposes. No intention to make it for generic purposes. > > I have no clue about the ARM iommus on the omap-platform. From a quick > look into the header file I see some similarities to the IOMMU-API. I am
ARM's iommu stuff might be more appropriate as the IOMMU-API than include/linux/iommu.h
> also very open for discussions about how the IOMMU-API could be extended > to fit the needs of other platforms. Only because nobody has tried to > discuss about such an effort is no reason to push the IOMMU-API back.
Well, the reason (nobody has tried) might be that linux/iommu.h doesn't look something intended for the generic IOMMU-API.
| |