Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:14:14 +0800 | From | Cong Wang <> | Subject | Re: [Patch] kexec: increase max of kexec segments and use dynamic allocation |
| |
On 07/26/10 20:19, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cong Wang<amwang@redhat.com> writes: > >> So, what is a better number? 2048? :) > > I was thinking something a little ridiculous like 10K or 64K. > > Assuming the usage you care about is something like hibernate on a > machine with disjoint memory where you truly need one segment for > each memory region. > > The only point of a limit at all once we introduce dynamic allocation > is to catch buggy apps. >
Ok, I will change that number and improve the changelog.
Thanks.
-- The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. - Elie Wiesel
| |