lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/7] memcg: mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() doesn't need sc.nodemask
Date
> * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2010-07-16 19:14:15]:
>
> > Currently mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone() call shrink_zone() directly.
> > thus it doesn't need to initialize sc.nodemask. shrink_zone() doesn't
> > use it at all.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/swap.h | 3 +--
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +--
> > mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++------
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > index ff4acea..bf4eb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> > unsigned int swappiness,
> > - struct zone *zone,
> > - int nid);
> > + struct zone *zone);
> > extern int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file);
> > extern unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages);
> > extern int vm_swappiness;
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index aba4310..01f38ff 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -1307,8 +1307,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
> > /* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
> > if (check_soft)
> > ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
> > - noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone,
> > - zone->zone_pgdat->node_id);
> > + noswap, get_swappiness(victim), zone);
> > else
> > ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
> > noswap, get_swappiness(victim));
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index bd1d035..be860a0 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
> > unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap,
> > unsigned int swappiness,
> > - struct zone *zone, int nid)
> > + struct zone *zone)
> > {
> > struct scan_control sc = {
> > .nr_to_reclaim = SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX,
> > @@ -1940,13 +1940,9 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> > .order = 0,
> > .mem_cgroup = mem,
> > };
> > - nodemask_t nm = nodemask_of_node(nid);
> > -
> > sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) |
> > (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> > - sc.nodemask = &nm;
> > - sc.nr_reclaimed = 0;
> > - sc.nr_scanned = 0;
>
> We need the initialization to 0, is there a reason why it was removed?

please reread C spec and other scan_control user.
sc_nr_* were already initialized in struct scan_control sc = { } line.



> What happens when we compare or increment sc.nr_*?
>
> Can we keep this indepedent of the tracing patches?
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * NOTE: Although we can get the priority field, using it
> > * here is not a good idea, since it limits the pages we can scan.
> > --
> > 1.6.5.2
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>
> --
> Three Cheers,
> Balbir





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-23 07:17    [W:0.076 / U:1.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site