Messages in this thread | | | From | Helmut Schaa <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] tpm_tis: Fix subsequent suspend failures | Date | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:07:51 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
Am Mittwoch 23 Juni 2010 schrieb Andrew Morton: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:54 -0300 > Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > (top-posting repaired. Please don't do that). > > > > > > This wasn't a very good way to send a patch. I edited the diff, > > > reconstructed the patch and then assembled a decent-looking changelog. > > > I also changed your acked-by to the required signed-off-by, because you > > > were on the patch's delivery path. > > > > > > Pretty please: next time, prepare a proper mergeable patch with the > > > correct attributions and signoffs? Thanks. > > > > Sure, sorry. I was just not certain if I could just resent Helmut's patch to LKML without messing with his authorship. > > You can. Put his "From:" line right at the top of the changelog and > everyone's patch-receiving tools will honour that. If the From: at the > top of the changelog is absent, the tools will fall back to using the > From: line in the mail headers.
This patch still didn't make it into mainline and it fixes a regression. Rajiv, do you plan to resubmit the patch or did you expect it to go through Andrew's tree?
Thanks, Helmut
| |