[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH wq#for-next] workqueue: fix how cpu number is stored in work->data
    Tejun Heo wrote:
    > Once a work starts execution, its data contains the cpu number it was
    > on instead of pointing to cwq. This is added by commit 7a22ad75
    > (workqueue: carry cpu number in work data once execution starts) to
    > reliably determine the work was last on even if the workqueue itself
    > was destroyed inbetween.
    > Whether data points to a cwq or contains a cpu number was
    > distinguished by comparing the value against PAGE_OFFSET. The
    > assumption was that a cpu number should be below PAGE_OFFSET while a
    > pointer to cwq should be above it. However, on architectures which
    > use separate address spaces for user and kernel spaces, this doesn't
    > hold as PAGE_OFFSET is zero.
    > Fix it by using an explicit flag, WORK_STRUCT_CWQ, to mark what the
    > data field contains. If the flag is set, it's pointing to a cwq;
    > otherwise, it contains a cpu number.
    > Reported on s390 and microblaze during linux-next testing.
    > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <>
    > Reported-by: Sachin Sant <>
    > Reported-by: Michal Simek <>
    > Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <>
    > ---
    > Yeah, that was a stupid assumption by me. Can you guys please test
    > whether this fixes the problem?
    > Thanks.

    Microblaze is OK.

    Tested-by: Michal Simek <>


    Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
    PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
    w: p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-22 22:19    [W:0.020 / U:53.180 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site