Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:36:12 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] make kvm mmu shrinker more aggressive |
| |
On 06/22/2010 07:32 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> That changes a few things. I bet all the contention we were seeing was >>> just from nr_to_scan=0 calls and not from actual shrink operations. >>> Perhaps we should just stop this set after patch 4. >>> >>> >> At the very least, we should re-measure things. >> > Sure. I'll go back to the folks that found this in the first place and > see how these patches affect the contention we were seeing. >
Dave, how did those tests go?
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
| |