lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks
On 21.07.10 13:17:18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only,
> > > just to not break other's patch queues.
> > >
> >
> > Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the
> > *next* merge window.
> >
> > -hpa
> >
>
> ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment
> instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose.

Yes, I am just using:

if (!smp_processor_id())
...
Cyrill, if you like, I will leave it up to you to introduce the
is_boot_cpu() macro.

I still have patch 7/7 in my new posting in that removes the
boot_cpu_id. If your patch comes soon this will be obsolete as all
places will have the macro then.

Thanks,

-Robert

--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-21 19:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site