Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:24:28 +0200 | | From | Robert Richter <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks |
| |
On 21.07.10 13:17:18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > > > > > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only, > > > just to not break other's patch queues. > > > > > > > Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the > > *next* merge window. > > > > -hpa > > > > ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment > instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose.
Yes, I am just using:
if (!smp_processor_id()) ... Cyrill, if you like, I will leave it up to you to introduce the is_boot_cpu() macro.
I still have patch 7/7 in my new posting in that removes the boot_cpu_id. If your patch comes soon this will be obsolete as all places will have the macro then.
Thanks,
-Robert
-- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Operating System Research Center
|  |