lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] x86, xsave: some code cleanups and reworks
    On 21.07.10 13:17:18, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
    > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:11:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > > On 07/21/2010 10:01 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Peter, also I think such tuning must be done at merge window time only,
    > > > just to not break other's patch queues.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Realistically it should be done right after the merge window for the
    > > *next* merge window.
    > >
    > > -hpa
    > >
    >
    > ok, which means Robert should use old conventional test at the moment
    > instead of introducing is_boot_cpu I suppose.

    Yes, I am just using:

    if (!smp_processor_id())
    ...

    Cyrill, if you like, I will leave it up to you to introduce the
    is_boot_cpu() macro.

    I still have patch 7/7 in my new posting in that removes the
    boot_cpu_id. If your patch comes soon this will be obsolete as all
    places will have the macro then.

    Thanks,

    -Robert

    --
    Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    Operating System Research Center



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-21 19:27    [W:0.023 / U:59.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site