Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:31:54 +0900 | From | Jin Dongming <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] KVM: IOAPIC: only access APIC registers one dword at a time |
| |
Hi, Xiao Guangrong
Xiao Guangrong wrote: > The IOAPIC spec says: > > When accessing these registers, accesses must be done one dword at a time. > For example, software should never access byte 2 from the Data register before > accessing bytes 0 and 1. The hardware will not attempt to recover from a bad > programming model in this case.
I could understand what you described on the above, but I don't think it is the best method to fix it. Could you consider a nice one?
> > So, this patch removes other width access > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > virt/kvm/ioapic.c | 10 +++------- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c > index 1149c60..f96816f 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.c > @@ -306,14 +306,10 @@ static int ioapic_mmio_read(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr, int len, > spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock); > > switch (len) { > - case 8: > - *(u64 *) val = result; > - break; > - case 1: > - case 2: > case 4: > - memcpy(val, (char *)&result, len);
Here the parameter len is not used for reading data from ioapic register, before switch case the value of ioapic register has been read by ioapic_read_indirect().
> + *(u32 *) val = result; > break; > + > default: > printk(KERN_WARNING "ioapic: wrong length %d\n", len);
And I think here is not good to print warning message. Maybe it is better to do such kind of checking at the first of this function before ioapic_read_indirect().
> } > @@ -332,7 +328,7 @@ static int ioapic_mmio_write(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr, int len, > (void*)addr, len, val); > ASSERT(!(addr & 0xf)); /* check alignment */ > > - if (len == 4 || len == 8) > + if (len == 4) > data = *(u32 *) val; > else { > printk(KERN_WARNING "ioapic: Unsupported size %d\n", len);
So I hope you could read the source code again. I think you can use a better method to fix it.
Best Regards, Jin Dongming
| |