[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] x86_64 page fault NMI-safe
On 07/15/2010 03:16 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> This code assumes NMIs have a separate stack.
> It also needs to be made per-cpu (and the flags be per-cpu).
> Then you could in fact possibly test the stack pointer for whether it
> is in the NMI stack area, and use the value of %rsp itself as the
> flag. So you could avoid the flag entirely. Because testing %rsp is
> valid - testing %rip is not.
> That would also avoid the race, because %rsp (as a flag) now gets
> cleared atomically by the "iret". So that might actually solve things.

This seems really clean to me.


H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-16 00:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans