lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [AppArmor #5 0/13] AppArmor security module
FromMiklos Szeredi <>
DateThu, 15 Jul 2010 15:06:03 +0200
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote:
> This is the fifth general posting of the newest version of the
> AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path
> hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation
> is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor
> as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure.
>
> Development is on going and
> improvements to file, capability, network, resource usage and ipc mediation
> are planned.
>
> With this submission we believe AppArmor is ready for inclusion into
> the kernel.
>
> _Issues NOT specifically addressed_
> * The d_namespace_path function still manually strips the " (deleted)"
> string that __d_path appends. A fix to __d_path is being pursued
> independently of the AppArmor submission.

Latest posting on that front:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/6/186

Thanks,
Miklos


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-15 15:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2010