Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [AppArmor #5 0/13] AppArmor security module | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:06:03 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, John Johansen wrote: > This is the fifth general posting of the newest version of the > AppArmor security module it has been rewritten to use the security_path > hooks instead of the previous vfs approach. The current implementation > is aimed at being as semantically close to previous versions of AppArmor > as possible while using the existing LSM infrastructure. > > Development is on going and > improvements to file, capability, network, resource usage and ipc mediation > are planned. > > With this submission we believe AppArmor is ready for inclusion into > the kernel. > > _Issues NOT specifically addressed_ > * The d_namespace_path function still manually strips the " (deleted)" > string that __d_path appends. A fix to __d_path is being pursued > independently of the AppArmor submission.
Latest posting on that front:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/6/186
Thanks, Miklos
| |