lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for July 7
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 09:45:13 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Andrew, Al,
>
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:20:42 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Bug is still there. Reverting ""Make ->drop_inode() just return
> > whether inode needs to be dropped" makes it go away.
> >
> > Al, please don't just dump crap in linux-next and then ignore bug reports.
> > People are trying to get work done here.
>
> I will revert that commit in linux-next today if it is still there (and
> not fixed).

Reverting the patch didn't help - the patch moved the BUG_ON() from
generic_delete_inode() into __iput_final(). With the patch reverted
the kernel still goes BUG over the same test in generic_delete_inode().

It could be that the bug was caused by fs-writeback.c changes. David,
do you have time to take a look at this?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-15 02:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans