[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/2] x86_64 page fault NMI-safe
    On 07/14/2010 03:37 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > I think the %rip check should be pretty simple - exactly because there
    > is only a single point where the race is open between that 'mov' and
    > the 'iret'. So it's simpler than the (similar) thing we do for
    > debug/nmi stack fixup for sysenter that has to check a range.
    > The only worry is if that crazy paravirt code wants to paravirtualize
    > the iretq. Afaik, paravirt does that exactly because they screw up
    > iret handling themselves. Maybe we could stop doing that stupid iretq
    > paravirtualization, and just tell the paravirt people to do the same
    > thing I propose, and just allow nesting.

    We screw around with iret because there's a separate interrupt mask flag
    which can't be set atomically with respect to a stack/ring change (well,
    there's more to it, but I won't confuse matters).

    But it only really matters if the PV guest can also get NMI-like
    interrupts. While Xen supports NMI for PV guests, we don't use it much
    and I haven't looked into implementing support for it yet.


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-15 00:53    [W:0.018 / U:161.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site