Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: stable? quality assurance? | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:34:03 +0200 |
| |
Le dimanche 11 juillet 2010 à 19:58 +0400, William Pitcock a écrit : > ----- "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Something like 2.6.32.16 : Its probably more stable than all 2.6.X > > kernels. > > 2.6.32.16 (possibly 2.6.32.15) has a regression where it is unusable > as a Xen domU. I would say 2.6.32.12 is the best choice since who knows > what other regressions there are in .16. >
Yea, strictly speaking, you can be sure no kernel will be bug free, ever.
This is why I said "probably more stable" ;)
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |