Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/13] perf: Rework the PMU methods | | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | | Date | Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:47:22 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 15:36 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> So, if I understood well, this is to avoid enabling an event from perf_pmu_enable() > while the event was already stopped.
Right.
> Looks good but why this ARCH name then? This should be a kind of PERF_HES_ONCPU > or so.
Because I failed to come up with a sensible name, ONCPU doesn't really make sense either, its got nothing to do with CPUs.
_REALLY_STOPPED maybe, but then, that's a bad name too ;-)
|  |