lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4 08/13] USB: gadget: g_serial: INF file updated
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:33:51 +0200, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>> The RNDIS template was taken from:
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff570620.aspx
>>
>> The CDC ACM was sent by Xiaofan Chen who said that it is probably
>> taken indirectly form MSDN as well.
>
> Ok, and not from the Windows DDK, right? That has a different license
> than MSDN.

RNDIS is from MSDN for sure. As of serial, I couldn't find it there.

>> The MSDN TOS reads:
>> >If Microsoft makes any code marked as “sample” available on this
>> >Web Site without a License Agreement, then that code is licensed
>> >to you under the terms of the Microsoft Limited Public License.
>>
>> Where the MLPL can be found at:
>> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/cc300389.aspx#MLPL>. It seems like
>> a perfectly legal free software license except point 3(F):
>>
>> >(F) Platform Limitation- The licenses granted in sections 2(A) & 2(B)
>> >extend only to the software or derivative works that you create that
>> >run on a Microsoft Windows operating system product.
>>
>> Also, 3(D) requires that the whole license is included:
>> >(D) If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form,
>> >you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of
>> >this license with your distribution. If you distribute any portion of
>> >the software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under
>> >a license that complies with this license.
>>
>> Therefore, shall we include the license along with the INFs and ignore
>> the fact it's not fully free software?

> No, it's not "software" here, and it is abiding by the license of the
> MLPL as you don't run that file on any non-Windows machine.

Well... According to the license (if we assume the license apply to the
INF template) it is "software":
> This license governs use of code marked as “sample” available on this
> Web Site without a License Agreement , as provided under the Section
> above titled “NOTICE SPECIFIC TO SOFTWARE AVAILABLE ON THIS WEB SITE”.
> If you use such code (the “software”), you accept this license.

On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:33:51 +0200, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> How about putting the following on the file:
> ; based on a example .inf file that was:
> ; Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
> ; and released under the MLPL as found at
> ; http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/cc300389.aspx#MLPL
> ; For use only on Windows operating systems.
> ;
>
> Interesting that they don't put a date on the copyright.
>
> With that wording, I'd be glad to take it.

If no one sees any legal issues here I can change the patch accordingly.
I'm more and more confused by the whole issue. ;)

--
Best regards, _ _
| Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
| Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
+----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-09 17:55    [W:1.928 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site