lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:26:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That takes a lot of the bullshit arguments about downstream users
> being hurt out of the discussion. The above problems are way more
> complex to resolve than the suspend blocker details.
>
> That's another prove why we can let the drivers flow in (in the worst
> case w/o the suspend blocker stubs) and have no pressure to resolve
> the suspend blocker problem yesterday.
>
> That said, after thinking more about it, I'm advocating the stubs
> solution with a clear removal / decision date constraint
> (e.g. 2.6.37), as it forces all involved parties to stay tuned and not
> to forget about it. I'm curious about the outcome :)

As long as we have that clear removal schedule I'm fine with in-kernel
suspend blocker stubs.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-07 10:03    [W:0.188 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site