lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] irq: support IRQ_NESTED_THREAD with non-threaded interrupt handlers
From
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Maybe you understand now, why I was pretty sure upfront, that your
> approach was wrong even without knowing all the gory details ? :)

I understand. There is a better solution, which is to use threaded
interrupts where needed.

But I must confess that I am disappointed that you still fail to see
how the pca953x
patch actually eliminates the need for serialization. But I don't
think there is much
point in going on about that.

The phy driver should be rewritten to use a threaded handler, it will
solve my particular problem.
And in the meantime, I have been promised to get the phy interrupts ofloaded
to real CPU interrupt lines :-)

Oh, I still think that the disable_irq_nosync documentaiton is misleading.
Functions that are allowed in a particular context should not call functions
that are not allowed to be called in that context. But now I know :-)

/Esben
--
Esben Haabendal, Senior Software Consultant
DoréDevelopment ApS, Ved Stranden 1, 9560 Hadsund, DK-Denmark
Phone: +45 51 92 53 93, E-mail: eha@doredevelopment.dk
WWW: http://www.doredevelopment.dk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-07 23:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans