Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:49:39 +0200 | From | Florian Mickler <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) |
| |
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 20:16:33 +0300 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > Do you realistically think that by hurting the _user_ you will make the > > _developer_ write better code? No, really. > > As an application writer, if my users complain that their battery is > being drained (as it happened), they stop using it, and other people > see there are problems, so they stop using it, if people get angry > about it they will vote it down. > > New users will see it has low score; they will not install it. That's > a network effect. > > Having users is the quintessential reason people write code. >
That is nice. But how does it impact the problem that suspend blockers solve? And why do suspend blockers interfere with that?
Cheers, Flo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |