lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
    From
    2010/6/2 Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>:
    > 2010/6/2 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>:
    >> (and please don't mention @#$@ up x86 ACPI again, Intel knows, they're
    >> fixing it, get over it already).
    >>
    >
    > I don't think it is realistic to drop support for all existing hardware.

    We are talking about mainline here, there's no support for suspend
    blockers, so nothing is dropped.

    In the mind of everybody, suspend blockers is for opportunistic
    suspend, which only makes sense on sensible hw (not current x86). So
    in the mind of everybody, x86 should be out of scope for the analysis
    of suspend blockers.

    Are you seriously suggesting that one of the strong arguments in favor
    of suspend blockers is x86 usage (nobody agrees)? If not, then drop
    it.

    >>> Unrelated to
    >>> Android, I also want to use opportunistic suspend on my desktop.
    >>
    >> So you're going to sprinkle this suspend blocker shite all over regular
    >> userspace?
    >
    > I have said several times, that regular user-space will not need to be
    > modified to maintain their current behavior.

    If I enable suspend blockers on my laptop, I have to modify my
    user-space. Otherwise my system will behave horribly.

    --
    Felipe Contreras
    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-05 19:47    [W:4.084 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site