Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Jun 2010 16:06:04 -0400 | From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] swiotlb-0.8.2^H3: seperation of physical/virtual address translation and core memory allocation. |
| |
> > in your -mm tree. > > I don't put individual git trees into -mm any more - I get them from > linux-next.
Ahh. OK. > > I could grab the individual patches but I don't see that this gains > anyone anything. I'd suggest that you ask Stephen to include this tree > in linux-next then ask Linus to pull it into 2.6.36-rc1.
Stephen,
I was wondering if you wouldn't mind including the following git tree in your linux-next?
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb-2.6.git
The patches are in the MAIN branch (and also in swiotlb-0.8.3).
They have the Tested-by, Signed-off-by, and Acked-by signatures.
Andrew, > > [nice description]
Thank you. > > The sad thing is that this description will get lost because it isn't .. snip.. > and then follow it with the specific description for [patch 1/n]. I > suggest that you make such change in this tree.
Done! > > It's not a very good solution because anyone who is looking at [patch .. snip .. > "see <patch name> for a description of this work" or similar.
Done! > > Even better would be if git understood this workflow - if it was able > to take commentary-only commits and to bidirectionally link those > commentaries to the invividual commits which they describe. > ..snip. > mixture of "enum dma_data_direction dir" and "enum dma_data_direction > direction", which could be cleaned up.
Oh, good catch. Fixed that.
| |