lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] swiotlb-0.8.2^H3: seperation of physical/virtual address translation and core memory allocation.
> > in your -mm tree.
>
> I don't put individual git trees into -mm any more - I get them from
> linux-next.

Ahh. OK.
>
> I could grab the individual patches but I don't see that this gains
> anyone anything. I'd suggest that you ask Stephen to include this tree
> in linux-next then ask Linus to pull it into 2.6.36-rc1.

Stephen,

I was wondering if you wouldn't mind including the following git tree
in your linux-next?

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/swiotlb-2.6.git

The patches are in the MAIN branch (and also in swiotlb-0.8.3).

They have the Tested-by, Signed-off-by, and Acked-by signatures.

Andrew,
> > [nice description]

Thank you.
>
> The sad thing is that this description will get lost because it isn't
.. snip..
> and then follow it with the specific description for [patch 1/n]. I
> suggest that you make such change in this tree.

Done!
>
> It's not a very good solution because anyone who is looking at [patch
.. snip ..
> "see <patch name> for a description of this work" or similar.

Done!
>
> Even better would be if git understood this workflow - if it was able
> to take commentary-only commits and to bidirectionally link those
> commentaries to the invividual commits which they describe.
>
..snip.
> mixture of "enum dma_data_direction dir" and "enum dma_data_direction
> direction", which could be cleaned up.

Oh, good catch. Fixed that.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-04 22:11    [W:0.064 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site