[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] cfq: always return false from should_idle if slice_idle is set to zero
    Jens Axboe <> writes:

    > On 21/06/10 21.49, Jeff Moyer wrote:
    >> Hi,
    >> In testing a competing fsync-ing process and a sequential reader on
    >> mid-grade storage, I found that cfq was incapable of achieving the I/O
    >> rates of deadline, no matter how it was tuned. Investigation, and insight
    >> from Vivek (mostly the latter), led to identifying that we were still
    >> idling for the last queue in the service tree.
    >> Modifying cfq_should_idle to not idle when slice_idle is set to zero got
    >> us much closer to the performance of deadline for this workload. I have
    >> one follow-on patch that gets us on-par with deadline, but I think this
    >> patch stands alone.
    >> Comments, as always, are appreciated.
    > This looks good.

    So.... applied to which branch?


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-28 20:45    [W:0.021 / U:3.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site