[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 16/52] fs: dcache RCU for multi-step operaitons
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:02 +1000, wrote:
> plain text document attachment (fs-dcache_lock-multi-step.patch)
> The remaining usages for dcache_lock is to allow atomic, multi-step read-side
> operations over the directory tree by excluding modifications to the tree.
> Also, to walk in the leaf->root direction in the tree where we don't have
> a natural d_lock ordering.
> This could be accomplished by taking every d_lock, but this would mean a
> huge number of locks and actually gets very tricky.
> Solve this instead by using the rename seqlock for multi-step read-side
> operations. Insert operations are not serialised. Delete operations are
> tricky when walking up the directory our parent might have been deleted
> when dropping locks so also need to check and retry for that.
> XXX: hmm, we could of course just take the rename lock if there is any worry
> about livelock. Most of these are slow paths.

Ah, does this address John's issue?

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 10:01    [W:0.489 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site