[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 13:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > And I really want hardirq context for perf callbacks, some code actually
> > relies on it (I used to have the fallback in the timer softirq and that
> Surely that could be fixed? *requiring* hard irq context sounds weird.

possibly, but there is no reason what so ever to use softirq here.

> > broke thing at some point).
> I have one case that needs to sleep (but only when interrupting user code)
> They key thing in it really is to switch stacks back to process.

softirq can't sleep either, you need a trampoline anyway.

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 13:13    [W:0.087 / U:11.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site