lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
> And I really want hardirq context for perf callbacks, some code actually
> relies on it (I used to have the fallback in the timer softirq and that

Surely that could be fixed? *requiring* hard irq context sounds weird.

> broke thing at some point).

I have one case that needs to sleep (but only when interrupting user code)
They key thing in it really is to switch stacks back to process.

-andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-24 13:11    [W:0.878 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site