Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:46:27 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH UPDATED] sched: adjust when cpu_active and cpuset configurations are updated during cpu on/offlining | From | Tony Luck <> |
| |
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > I'm primarily curious why different archs are doing things > differently, which causes confusion and reduces test coverage. Also, > if you just think about the end result, what x86 is doing makes more > sense. Although it may end up with larger kernel image, it actually > allows more to be dropped once init is complete.
It allows x86 to drop some code that it never needed in the first place.
i don't think that is better :-)
Maybe someone from x86-land can explain why they *keep* __exit code as they are the ones doing it wrong (/me ducks, runs and hides)
-Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |