[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH 1/9] PM / Hibernate: swap, switch to hibernate_io_handle
    On 06/11/2010 11:46 AM, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
    > On 02/06/10 18:52, Jiri Slaby wrote:
    >> I addressed the comments I got on the previous RFC. I left the handles
    >> in place, the functions in hibernate_io_ops now works on them. Further
    >> I got rid of the memory barriers and minimized global variables as much
    >> as possible. Comments welcome.
    > I would like to hear the arguments for using these handles. I understand
    > there may have been some previous discussion, but am unable to find it.
    > It seems far more sensible to me to not pass around a handle that
    > virtually nothing actually uses, and instead store and utilise the state
    > in the place where it is actually useful. If we had more than one struct
    > hibernate_io_handle in use at a time, I could understand going this way.
    > As it stands, however...

    Hi, it I added that based on this:


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-21 17:23    [W:0.021 / U:2.848 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site