lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
    On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:

    > Hi Andrew,
    >
    > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:15:29PM -0400, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > The reason why these bugs occur is that we sprinkle multiple `return'
    > > statements inside the middle of non-trivial functions. People miss
    > > some or fail to modify some when later changing locking rules and we
    > > gain bugs (or, similarly, resource leaks).
    >
    > Right. I changed that in Julia's patch too before merging it into my
    > tree. It is already in -tip. See
    > http://git.kernel.org/tip/84fe6c19e4a598e8071e3bd1b2c923454eae1268

    Thanks. That looks fine.

    julia


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-02 10:45    [W:0.023 / U:1.488 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site