lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:15:29PM -0400, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The reason why these bugs occur is that we sprinkle multiple `return'
> > statements inside the middle of non-trivial functions. People miss
> > some or fail to modify some when later changing locking rules and we
> > gain bugs (or, similarly, resource leaks).
>
> Right. I changed that in Julia's patch too before merging it into my
> tree. It is already in -tip. See
> http://git.kernel.org/tip/84fe6c19e4a598e8071e3bd1b2c923454eae1268

Thanks. That looks fine.

julia


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-02 10:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans