Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:26:50 -0700 | From | "Justin P. Mattock" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6]kernel:module.c variable 'nowarn' set but not used |
| |
On 06/19/2010 01:23 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 22:10, Justin P. Mattock > <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 06/19/2010 12:45 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 21:10, Justin P. Mattock >>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 06/19/2010 01:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 07:04, Justin P. Mattock >>>>> <justinmattock@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also wrong, you removed the creation of the links in sysfs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The assignment to nowarn was there to avoid another compiler warning, >>>>>>> as sysfs_create_link() is marked __must_check. >>>>>> >>>>>> I also went back to this one and made the following changes.. let me >>>>>> know >>>>>> if >>>>>> it's wrong etc.. >>>>>> >>>>>> From 4f45beed80627d2bb32fb021bb6d22d88089557b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> >>>>>> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:01:07 -0700 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] module.c >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> kernel/module.c | 3 +-- >>>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c >>>>>> index 8c6b428..48fc5c8 100644 >>>>>> --- a/kernel/module.c >>>>>> +++ b/kernel/module.c >>>>>> @@ -1340,11 +1340,10 @@ static void add_usage_links(struct module *mod) >>>>>> { >>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD >>>>>> struct module_use *use; >>>>>> - int nowarn; >>>>>> >>>>>> mutex_lock(&module_mutex); >>>>>> list_for_each_entry(use,&mod->target_list, target_list) { >>>>>> - nowarn = sysfs_create_link(use->target->holders_dir, >>>>>> + sysfs_create_link(use->target->holders_dir, >>>>>> &mod->mkobj.kobj, mod->name); >>>>>> } >>>>>> mutex_unlock(&module_mutex); >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 1.7.1.rc1.21.gf3bd6 >>>>>> >>>>>> if it looks good, then I can resend it out. >>>>> >>>>> Have you compile-tested this? >>>>> As sysfs_create_link() is marked __must_check, that will cause another >>>>> compiler >>>>> warning, but only if CONFIG_SYSFS=y. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps you can just mark the nowarn variable __unused? >>>> >>>> >>>> o.k. this builds cleanly without a warning, but is it the right thing >>>> todo? >>>> i.g. rather leave the warning message there and file a bug than just >>>> silence >>>> the issue. Anyways here is what I have: >>>> >>>> From edbeb2b1ee051218f9e5b93fcb8bbdbf1119a6e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>> From: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:07:32 -0700 >>>> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] module.c >>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> kernel/module.c | 2 +- >>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c >>>> index 8c6b428..765bac5 100644 >>>> --- a/kernel/module.c >>>> +++ b/kernel/module.c >>>> @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static void add_usage_links(struct module *mod) >>>> { >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD >>>> struct module_use *use; >>>> - int nowarn; >>>> + int nowarn __attribute__((unused)); >>> >>> The `__attribute__((unused))' should be `__used'. >>> >> >> I'm confused now. how should I write that out? >> (google is not giving me vary many examples on this) > > Sorry, I misrememberd there was a #define for it, and could find only __used. > But on closer look, the `__attribute__((unused)` is correct. >
alright!! then I'll resend this with the above change.
Thanks for looking at this!!
Justin P. Mattock
| |