[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/3] Unified NMI delayed call mechanism
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> The proper, generic approach would be to enable softirq notifications (on x86)
> from NMI contexts as well (it's actually possible without overhead),

Yes. I will do that. And I think self interrupt can be used as the
short-cut for soft_irq if available. The next soft_irq may be too late
if there is too few interrupts.

> and to
> extend user return notifiers with the logical next step: nmi return notifiers.
> If presented in such a form then those could use softirqs for atomic callbacks
> and per cpu kthreads for sleepable callbacks, etc.

NMI return notifiers fired in soft_irq?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-19 16:09    [W:0.051 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site