lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 17 Jun 2010 12:13:52 -0700
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/10] BKL conversion in tty layer
FromTony Luck <>
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> At this point I think the only way to make further progress is to
> actually push this stuff into the kernel on top of the BKL removal
> patches for the drivers and see what happens. Something will no doubt
> break but we can try and nail them in time or if not revert the series
> and try again next kernel.

These changes showed up in linux-next (tag: next-20100617) ... and I'm seeing
a few WARN_ON messages on ia64 while booting:

WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_open+0x160/0xc60()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_open+0x9d0/0xc60()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x90/0xbc0()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x630/0xbc0()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x90/0xbc0()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x630/0xbc0()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x90/0xbc0()
WARNING: at include/linux/tty.h:589 tty_release+0x630/0xbc0()

Stack trace for the first of these looks like:
Call Trace:
[<a0000001000159d0>] show_stack+0x50/0xa0
[<a00000010090f250>] dump_stack+0x30/0x50
[<a00000010008e2c0>] warn_slowpath_common+0xc0/0x120
[<a00000010008e360>] warn_slowpath_null+0x40/0x60
[<a00000010053ebe0>] tty_open+0x160/0xc60
[<a0000001001af9b0>] chrdev_open+0x310/0x360
[<a0000001001a58b0>] __dentry_open+0x350/0x680
[<a0000001001a5d80>] nameidata_to_filp+0x80/0xc0
[<a0000001001bfee0>] finish_open+0x160/0x380
[<a0000001001c0cc0>] do_last+0xbc0/0xce0
[<a0000001001c5270>] do_filp_open+0x2f0/0xb40
[<a0000001001a5290>] do_sys_open+0x90/0x200
[<a0000001001a54d0>] sys_open+0x50/0x80
[<a000000100b907e0>] kernel_init+0x340/0x420
[<a000000100013c10>] kernel_thread_helper+0x30/0x60
[<a00000010000a0c0>] start_kernel_thread+0x20/0x40
Does anyone see anything similar on other architectures? Or is ia64 doing
something "special" here?

-Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-17 21:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2010