lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue
From
Date
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >> I don't have any problem with that. I would be almost happy to get
> >> your NACK.
> >
> > Oh yeah? why is that?
>
> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
> discussion. So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
>
> Thanks and have a good night.

Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if
people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread.

Daniel



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-16 22:43    [W:0.109 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site