Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Subject | [PATCH 8/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed() | Date | Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:35:15 +0900 (JST) |
| |
Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but it should use while_each_thread().
It slightly improve the code readability.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> --- mm/oom_kill.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 4236d39..7e9942d 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zone_scan_lock); * shares the same mempolicy nodes as current if it is bound by such a policy * and whether or not it has the same set of allowed cpuset nodes. */ -static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, +static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const nodemask_t *mask) { - struct task_struct *start = tsk; + struct task_struct *tsk = p; do { if (mask) { @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, if (cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk)) return true; } - tsk = next_thread(tsk); - } while (tsk != start); + } while_each_thread(p, tsk); + return false; } #else -- 1.6.5.2
| |