Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: concurrency managed workqueue, take#5 | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:49:12 -0700 |
| |
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 00:44 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 06/15/2010 12:35 AM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > What is you definition of "concurrency" ? and explain try to explain it > > in terms of your patchset. > > How many workers are concurrently executing? What else? Eh... I'll > write up another summary tomorrow. Let's talk it there.
I'd suggest If you write up another description try to not use the word concurrency .. That term can be used for all sorts of things, and it doesn't covey enough detail for anyone to know what your implementation is actually doing.
Daniel
| |