[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration
    On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

    > Moreover, having thought a bit more about the "power manager in user space"
    > concept I'm not sure if it really is that better than the original wakelocks
    > idea. Namely, it only repaces a kernel-based mechanism with a user space
    > task doing basically the same thing, but the communication between that task
    > and the other cooperating user space tasks is arguably more complicated (it
    > also uses the kernel resources, although indirectly).

    That is all true. The "power manager in userspace" was meant to prove
    a point: that this _could_ be done without invasive changes to the
    kernel. It wasn't necessarily meant to be a _better_ solution.

    > So, for a phone-like system, where you'd generally want to simplify user space,
    > having a "power manager" in the kernel seems to make sense to me.

    This is a judgment call. Obviously different people have different

    Alan Stern

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-10 16:49    [W:0.036 / U:1.828 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site