lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] input: mt: Document the MT event slot protocol (rev4)
Hi!

> +Protocol Example A
> +------------------
> +
> +Here is what a minimal event sequence for a two-contact touch would look
> +like for a type A device:
> +
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[0]
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[0]
> + SYN_MT_REPORT
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[1]
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[1]
> + SYN_MT_REPORT
> + SYN_REPORT
...
> -Usage
> ------
> +Here is the sequence after lifting the first contact:
> +
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[1]
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[1]
> + SYN_MT_REPORT
> + SYN_REPORT

...

> +Protocol Example B
> +------------------
> +
> +Here is what a minimal event sequence for a two-contact touch would look
> +like for a type B device:
> +
> + ABS_MT_SLOT 0
> + ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 45
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[0]
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[0]
> + ABS_MT_SLOT 1
> + ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID 46
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[1]
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_Y y[1]
> + SYN_REPORT
> +
> +Here is the sequence after moving contact 45 in the x direction:
> +
> + ABS_MT_SLOT 0
> + ABS_MT_POSITION_X x[0]
> + SYN_REPORT

With this proposed system, protocol A is *very* different from
protocol B. Is there way to make them more similar?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-10 15:59    [W:0.115 / U:1.008 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site