Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:04:25 -0700 | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree | From | Tony Luck <> |
| |
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > So, is it reasonable for me to ask you to revert commit > 0ac0c0d0f837c499afd02a802f9cf52d3027fa3b ("cpusets: randomize node rotor > used in cpuset_mem_spread_node()")? Reverting it won't break ia64 (since > their fix was to just add code that would then be unreferenced).
If that's the way you go - then just revert commit 4ec37de89d8c758ee8115e0e64b3f994910789ee too. I only put that in to get the ia64 build working when 0ac0c0d went upstream.
-Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |