[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Wrong DIF guard tag on ext2 write
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 12:47 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:29:30AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:49:51AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > > I agree that a block based retry would close all the holes ... it just
> > > > doesn't look elegant to me that the fs will already be repeating the I/O
> > > > if it changed the page and so will block.
> > >
> > > We might not ever repeat the IO. We might change the page, write it,
> > > change it again, truncate the file and toss the page completely.
> >
> > Why does it matter that it was never written in that case?
> It matters is the storage layer is going to wait around for the block to
> be written again with a correct crc.

Actually, I wasn't advocating that. I think block should return a guard
mismatch error. I think somewhere in filesystem writeout is the place
to decide whether the error was self induced or systematic. For self
induced errors (as long as we can detect them) I think we can just
forget about it ... if the changed page is important, the I/O request
gets repeated (modulo the problem of too great a frequency of changes
leading to us never successfully writing it) or it gets dropped because
the file was truncated or the data deleted for some other reason.


 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-01 18:57    [W:0.101 / U:3.920 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site